•  

Technically Funny Blog
"In Search of the Optimal Christmas"
   December 17, 2008

  Another Christmas is here and I am once again in search of the optimal holiday solution. Overall, last Christmas (2007) turned in a score of 3.5 Balls on the standard 4.0 Christmas Ball Scale (See Figure 1). It’s the closest  I have ever come to the optimal Christmas and way ahead of the 0.5 Ball Christmas of 2001.
Christmas Performance
    What am I talking about? What exactly is the standard 4.0 Ball Scale? Does the optimal Christmas really exist or is it a pipedream like the flywheel, bubble memory, or low-carb bread?  Well, I believe it does exist, but first you must define the challenge.   I have 4 goals at Christmas:

1. Send out cards.
2. Hang outside lights including Santa and reindeer.
3. Set-up tree.
4. Buy the perfect gift(s) for my wife.  

    Each goal represents 1.0 Balls on the 4.0 Christmas Ball Scale. If I score 4.0 Balls, I have achieved the optimal Christmas. After 10 years of marriage, I think I have a good handle on the first 3 goals. I print Christmas cards with a family picture on my photo printer and address labels are generated using an up-to-date Christmas Database. I have detailed schematics for all the house lighting. The animatronic Santa and reindeer are stored, intact, for easy yuletide installation. I also update the songs Santa plays every year with MP3 files downloaded from the internet. I find, haul, mount, and wire the Christmas tree. At this point, my wife swoops in and adds the artistic touch of garland and balls that give the tree warmth and style. My garland and ball technique has been described as “too symmetric” and “Spock-like”. I have had some problems through the years: In 1998 (My first non-bachelor year), I sent my own Christmas cards to my friends and family (not hers) resulting in great hostility and the charge “We’re supposed do our cards together!” Who knew? In 1999, my house light microprocessor (a 286 that I salvaged from an old IBM PC) was not Y2K compliant and crashed all the lights on our street on New Year’s Eve. In 2003, the MP3 file I downloaded to Santa and the reindeer had a virus. We had a “Trojan Santa”! I had to wipe Santa’s disk clean and reboot the reindeer. Santa and the team were down for 4 days. The final goal (the elusive 4th Ball) is the most difficult: the perfect gift(s) for my wife, Laura. At this point in my research, her gift(s) must meet the following 3 criteria:   1. She has to want it: In August, I start writing down everything Laura says: she likes; she “almost bought”; she can’t find; and anything her brother-in-law bought for her sister. By September 1, I have 500 to 600 items. 2. It must be backfire proof: Always consider the message a gift may send. For example, the gift of a membership to a gym will probably result in you’re never having sex again. Personally, I eliminate ALL clothes. Why? Style and size are potential disasters. If you pick a style that is out of date, she’ll ask, “Do you think I dress like my mother?” If you pick a style that is too trendy: “Are you saying I need to look younger?!” The choice of size is even more dicey. If you choose a size that’s too big, you’ll hear, “You think I’m fat.” If you buy a size that is too small: “Are you saying I need to lose weight?” And by the way, never say “Oh, you’ll grow into it” to smooth it over. 3. I must spend roughly the same amount as she does on a gift: According to most books about relationships you shouldn’t “keep score”. But I disagree. The universe is about balance. There needs to be balance. And so it is with Christmas presents. Here’s how my wife and I have matched up through the years:
Christmas Spending
   It’s important that I NOT spend less on Laura. I made that mistake in 2001 and I still hear about it every Christmas. I truly thought she needed and would like a new coffee mug. Especially, since I broke the old one. The next year, 2002, I spent about the same as she, but who knew she didn’t want 256MB of RAM. She needed it (her processor was thrashing horribly), but she didn’t want it - Very important distinction. In 2003, I decided to not leave anything to chance. I spent more than I could really afford, but I figured she would be happy – wrong! She was mortified. She felt guilty because I spent way more than her. Her present seemed insignificant. Starting in 2007, I instituted “SCS - Safe Cushion Spending”. Using “SCS”, I am reasonably sure of spending between 0 and 20% more than Laura. How do I do it? I cheat. I carefully monitor my wife’s on-line VISA bill. I make sure I spend between 0 and 20% more than she spends at any computer or electronics store (the only time she ever goes to Fry’s is for me at Christmas). Even using SCS this year, I missed. I was 30% short of her spending and therefore 0.5 Balls short of perfection. What was my downfall? Cash. She actually made several cash purchases. Who uses cash anymore? This year I have altered the “Safe Cushion Spending” formula to include a percentage of any variances in ATM cash withdrawals. I truly believe that Christmas 2008 may be the best Christmas ever! And that’s what Christmas is all about – believing that perfection is just around the corner. 
 
Link to Blog Archive